Hillary's Very Own Attache.
Posted by Allman at 2/1/2008 12:17 AM and is filed under uncategorized 
Barack Obama.
What a terrible and sissy performance at the debate.
Obviously stung by Hillary's "don't attack me because I'm a perpetual victim" mantra every 12 hours, Barack got on his knees for the Royal Clinton's and kissed their rings. He could barely muster an attack and let Hillary treat him like one of her employees--all friggin' night.
Theories?
1) The Kodak Theater bullcrap may have been one reason. It was actually Hillary and 1000 of her closest Hollywood friends. CNN chose the Oscar venue and stacked it full of stars like the stupid fat guy from Seinfeld, Kevin Costner, Louis Gossett, Stevie Wonder, Rob Riener and the chick from Annie Hall (I forgot her name).
This has Begala and Carville written all over it and since they are both CNN emloyees I know they made this happen. Obama's wea performance may have been due to him being nervous to be in an unfriendly crowd.
2) Barack knows he has it in the bag and he's jujst trying to get through the debate without messing up and giving the Feminazis more ammunition. I'm thinking that most Democrats have made up their minds already and this is all a window dressing deal.
3) The Clintons threatened to kill him. Or hire him as their lawyer. Or make him Commerce Secretary.
Obama supporters should be uniformly shocked at what a puppy Obama became at the debate.
The DNC has been orchestrating everything? Yes, maybe the DNC has been orchestrating most of the conflict between the two candidates, including Bill's involvement. The plan is to show that Hillary can be tough enough to compete and campaign just like a man, stare down Obama, and tame her husband. If she is tough enough to put both of them in their place then she is tough enough to be the president and wage the war on terror and get Congress to do what she wants it to do.
Reply to this
If a Democrap gets in office, we will no longer be fighting the war on terror overseas. We'll be fighting it here, in our streets.
Reply to this
How can anyone see it that way when we all know that it's not her doing any of it. Come on now, if she had any ability what-so-ever to stand up to her "husband" she would have left his sorry (take credit for Reagonomics) ass husband she would have kicked him to the curb a long time ago. Oh but wait, she couldn't because there is not a single person in the DNC who can stand the hag so she needs to keep Slick Willy around!!
Reply to this
Jamie,
I'll pick "Door #1":
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1866953/posts
Reply to this
the clinton machine is just warming up
barrack will soon be crying and running home to mommy
or taking a dirt nap in ft marcy park
Reply to this
If Osama Obama cowers before a corrupt dirty dog Hillary, what will he do in the face of the islamist threat?
Oh wait, he will cooperate fully seeing as his cousin is one and gives him full support much to the dismay of the rest of Kenya.
These 'debates' were a joke.
Hey Hillary and Obamalama, how do you dialogue and diplomate with an enemy that straps bombs on the disabled?
Given all of the arab money lining your pockets, Bill's association with Dubai/Kazakhstan uranimum mines, and your Saudi personal assistant, Huma, do you think that much conflict of interest would interfere with your ability to make proper decisions regarding the national security interests of the US?
Reply to this
As things stand, Huckabee and Paul, do not have a snowball's chance in this primary. So why are some people continuing to promote them which is resulting in the most offensive of the candidates on our side, out front?
McCain should not be running on the republican side. He should have went forward with his plan back in 2001 to make his democrat status complete.
Reply to this
Boy, that is one ugly lookin' broad.
Reply to this
Annie you bring up a good point ... but , I'm a bit lost when you say that the promotion of RP and MH just makes the worst candidates stand out .... McCain is a democrat true and Romney isn't much better .... who else is running on the republican side ?
the real question should be why are all the people flocking to the democrats on these primaries , when obama and clinton both pretty much said that either of them will be the other's running mate ? .. so they shouldn't be wasting votes in the democrat party for now , but actually thinking a little bit and using their powers to nominate a better candidate from the republican side as well ... just a thought .
Reply to this
I disagree Robert - Hillary hasn't proven her toughness at all. She's ridden on Bill's coattails to make it this far; it's funny because she has no coattails herself to bring victory to anyone else. This is the feminists' big victory? A woman who got where she is on her husband's "merit?" Give me a [redacted] break.
I will not vote for McCain in the primary but if he is the nominee against Hillary or Obama I will vote for the best conservative - and that is not the socialists on the Democrats' side. Limbaugh has beef with McCain and is making his personal issues national. People need to stop acting like we all don't know that. Coulter is exactly that: Ann Coulter.
I know one way or another I'm going to end up seriously ticked off tonight. Any conservative that votes for a socialist over McCain needs their ass handed to them - we've got Supreme Court nominations coming up, folks, lest we forget.
Reply to this