Dishonest Scum
They are artists Nora Ligorano and Marshall Reese.
Their M.O.?: Hate Through Art.
As early as 1994 they were doing drive bys on religious people. Click here for that backround.
Today, thanks to the support of taxpayer dollars from the citizens of New York, they are able to display their fascist propaganda against the Bush Administration. HERE's THE FULL STORY.
You see, there ARE actual mugshots of the likes of Sandy Berger, from the Clinton Administration. And there IS an actual charge of lying under oath against President Bill Clinton. But where does a picture of Bill Clinton wind up?
But Logarano and her cohort, thanks to public funds, have been allowed to pull a propaganda coup that Leni Riefenstahl would be proud of.
It's an entire display of fictitious mugshots representing obviously fictitious charges in the made up court of these fascist artists. It's the kind of totalitarian tactic that despots present and past would be proud of.
In the absence of real evidence of any crime, the artists invent one. HEIL!
And Jihadists all over the world celebrate this mimicking of their own pre-head severing ritual.
Will famed New Yorker Al Sharpton object to the use of historically haunting imagery used to depict a black person? And where are the good people of Hispanic heritage to come to the defense of Alberto Gonzalez?
No, these are Republicans we're talking about. Sew an "R" into their clothes and herd them together. That's art, eh?
Free expression? Most certainly. Acceptable in a publicly funded building? Not at all.
Burn the New York City Public Library to the ground.
Jamie, Surely you aren't advocating arson here, are ya?
Seriously, A public library that is funded by the government is definitely NOT a place to showcase anti-government 'art'. There are other, more-suitable venues for this, but it shouldn't be in the library.
Reply to this
First off , I have to applaud Allman and Crane for this morning's ( 11/30 ) coverage of the Republican debates from CNN the other night . Their program was fair and really addressed the issues at hand of question planting , unnecessary information , and loaded questions for candidates that CNN openly doesn't like (Tancredo , Thompson , and Paul) ..
And Let's Not forget John Mccain rewriting history for a cheap shot at Ron Paul and Rudy G.
Unfortunately I wasn't able to call in around 8 a.m. when they asked if anyone had theories on why it was so slanted .
So if they are reading this , I read a thread online that stated that CNN are big Hilary supporters , so not only would they direct the questions to make republicans look dumb but also focus on Rudy and Romney , two candidates which they believe Hilary could beat in a general election --- just a thought .
--- THIS TOPIC : there is a phrase which states " Artist's lie to tell truth , While Government Lies to cover it up "
As our right's to free speech are being slowly stripped away by different legislation an artist's right remains true , regardless of content .
such as a 15th century nude painting can be shown to middle schoolers , but live action nudity is prohibitted .
The difference has got to be from within the eye of the beholder and not the general perceptions of society . The situation in New York is laughable because Giuliani and Clinton both "represent" them , but they are both questionable sequels to G.W. Bush in a matter of thinking... hmmmm ... What the hell is Going on in New York ?
Reply to this
Wouldn't that sort of thing be considered libel?
"People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid."--Soren Kierkegaard
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that ye may know how ye ought to answer every man" [Colossians 4:6]
IMHO freedom of speech and freedom of expression doesn't mean freedom from consequences.
Reply to this
These are the same people who spit in a mason jar, add a bow to the top, put it on a pedestal and people wearing braids and Birkenstocks line up to admire it. Sadly, there are always idiots out there who are an audience for such "artists". Reminds me of the dog I saw on Letterman one evening that painted with his teeth. Although, the dog was much more talented.
Reply to this
Unfortunately, I'm not as forgiving when it comes to this crap. Scum is perhaps a much too mild term to describe these people. My very first reaction was....F****ng pieces of S**t. And in a taxpayer funded public library of all places. Hmmm, I've got art for you frickin' nutbags. Draw a picture of this right now....a hand, closed fisted, with a single, solitary finger sticking straight up in the air (and you can bet it's not the index one).
What a waste of sperm and egg on these folks.
Reply to this
The hatred for Bush runs so deep for these as*holes. Not that it's surprising for MSNBC to allow their reporters to be biased (since they're out of the closet now) but to blatantly show such disrespect for our President is beyond anything we've ever seen on a news channel. We mother's teach our children about basic manners apparently her mother never did.
Click to see...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HgvQgGDJuw
Reply to this
. It never ceases to amaze me the mantle these shit for brains hide behind and get away with it.ART... The atrocities they perpetuate on us is never ending. What,I ask all of you are some besides the crucifix dipped in (shit?) Just think........you get to go to a public place usually funded by you to view this tripe. It never ends.
Reply to this