The "Shift In Tone" And Other Hilarious Stuff
Imagine reports of success in Iraq measured in how the Democrats will best deal with it as they seek their political fortunes. Only in the New York Times. Wow.
Now it appears the defeatist drumbeat and terrorist aiding propaganda was simply "tone."
Now we get it.
You have to see the disgrace to believe it.
Read and weep here.
*****
Meanwhile, Click HERE for more evidence that our troops are stretched way too thin due to that "illegal" war.
*****
And welcome to the working week. You'll like watching this one. Click Here.
The cat's out of the bag, it was apparently an inside job all along. Sanchez should be immediately arrested and charged with treason, since under his command our military was stuck in the mud with soldiers playing the role of live targets for the terrorists and insurgents. Once he was relieved of command and replaced by Patraeus, we started to rock-and-roll with the surge.
This begs the question - Was Sanchez under orders from Murtha, Pelosi, and the rest of the defeatocrats to get as many Americans killed as possible while making no progress against the terrorists? This apparent conspiracy would be looked into if we really had a president who was a true leader with a set of cajones. Instead we get foot soldiers and border guards put on trial for doing their jobs and pathetic love-fest displays like this:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=aff_1196111149&p=1
"...private time..." Now isn't that special? Turning the tide of this war around is just another testament to our fine military - they can win this thing if given merely a SMALL opening by our inept political leadership.
Reply to this
Anyone who knows anything about body language can tell how painful it is for Billary to smile and shake hands with any member of the US Armed Forces. Another item on the "List of Things I'm Willing To Do to Get Elected."
Reply to this
And, they love her right back too.
http://www.snopes.com/photos/military/crossed.asp
Reply to this
The so-called mainstream media has been an extension/cheerleader/PR of the democrat party for how long? This has been quite obvious.
They share the same ideology and chameleon-like characteristics depending on how the wind blows. They have no scruples or honor or integrity.They play politics with our soldiers lives.
So, you can count on the 'tone' to shift again as the new year approaches or soon after as they know damn well that when the sheep start to pay more attention as the election draws near, their anti-military-jihadi- sympathizing stance will play against them. (as the NYSlimes are counseling them)
And Tracy, great picture. I was going to post that myself.
I know a guy who worked secret service from Reagan through Bush II. The Clinton's admitted they don't like the military and their actions proved it both publicly and privately. 'She' didn't want a uniform anywhere around her and if she saw one, her foul mouth let them know her displeasure. But, what do you expect from a 60's radical infused with the Stalinist way?
And as far as Bangladesh. That is the only way the libs want to see the military used. (hmmm...isn't that what varying charities and the Peace Corps is supposed to do?)
What I want to know is why don't the very wealthy muslim neighbors (UAE, Dubai, etc) take the lead and provide for their poorest muslim brothers? I thought that is what the spirit of the 'ummah' is all about. But, of course, I keep forgetting, that us stupid infidels must foot the bill as the dhimmis they see us as.
Reply to this
The NYT and the dem party are counting on the stupidity and short attention/memory spans of their constituents. Doesn't matter how Clinton voted to go to Iraq, then later plead that Bush tricked her. Doesn't matter how many positions she has had on any issue. In a sane world, she and the democrat party of today would be forced to hide in shame after we all piss ourselves with laughter at their incredible hypocrisy and idiocy. Instead, it will all go down the memory hole as the media will always give them a platform or cover.
It is all about power. How to gain it and how to keep it.
If only the sheep would pay attention, just a little bit.
Reply to this
Dear Joe, Hillary has no feelings at all. She has no emotion because is a driven woman! And what I mean by that is her hubby, dearest Bill, wants to rule the world! And he will not stop until she is the PREZ! Her hubby found a loop hole in the system, and it was Jimmy Carter! F up and move up! The republicans were to weak to blast JC into the dirt where he needed to be! And his party grew stronger from that. I spent many a lonely nights looking across the border of South Korea into north Korea. I was not afraid because I knew that my Commander in Chief was not going to let anything happen without just pushing it under the rug! Mr. Reagan would of swept the northern portions of the Korean peninsula into the dust pan if they tried anything. And now we have a SOS that wants to make peace in the Middle East. Crane had a woody for her, OOPS. She is not the person to be settling ME problems. She is a beautiful woman yes, however, she is not capable of understanding how to deal with the true Infidels! For is it written in their book of worship to change the mindset of another or kill them?
Reply to this
EXCELLENT, Sarge! Sadly, you're probably right about the U.S. as well, especially if the Bush/Clinton/Bush/Clinton...cabal stays in power.
Replace "EU" with "UN" in the pics in the video and it could well be our epitaph as well. Go here to see George Bush's latest push with the Democrats to relinquish OUR sovereingty (this might explain why he didn't give John Bolton another recess appointment to the UN):
http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071113/EDITORIAL/111130001
Reply to this
It's the Democrats' worst nightmare coming true, success in Iraq means they have to change their platform. What do they do now? whom do they attack now? It's nice to see them scrambling to shift gears. I'm really just waiting for them to start bitching about the current Annapolis love-fest being just a big Bush charrade. Wait, I thought they liked diplomacy?
Who knows, they're a joke on foreign policy issues.
Reply to this
Regarding the French riots touched on this morning's show, kudos to Shep Smith. Not once will the mainstream media, here, or across the pond, identify WHO the 'disaffected youths' are.
They are muslim. They do not want to assimilate. More money was thrown into the 'no go' areas around Paris and that made not one iota of difference. They tell the cops, the government, and the French to stay out of their 'areas'. Emergency cannot go into those areas to help the sick without a police escort and even then they are attacked.
For more info on the French riots going on now and the past two years, go to atlasshrugs.com, michellemalkin.com, or sweetness-light.com and search 'French riots'. The poor babies are not oppressed minorities as the libs want you to think.
Unfettered immigration, illegal or otherwise, PC, multiculturalism, scorn for own history and patriotism are a suicidal mix.
Muslim countries/communities will forever be shitholes as long as things like the following keep twisting their pants in a wad.
Briton in Sudan faces lashes over naming a teddy Mohammad.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22007049/?GT1=10547
To be sure, let's ask an imam what is permissable as regards stuffed critters...
http://www.islamqa.com/index.php?ref=87720&ln=eng&txt=stuffed%20toys
Reply to this