Barack Obama.
What a terrible and sissy performance at the debate.

Obviously stung by Hillary's "don't attack me because I'm a perpetual victim" mantra every 12 hours, Barack got on his knees for the Royal Clinton's and kissed their rings. He could barely muster an attack and let Hillary treat him like one of her employees--all friggin' night.

Theories?
1) The Kodak Theater bullcrap may have been one reason. It was actually Hillary and 1000 of her closest Hollywood friends. CNN chose the Oscar venue and stacked it full of stars like the stupid fat guy from Seinfeld, Kevin Costner, Louis Gossett, Stevie Wonder, Rob Riener and the chick from Annie Hall (I forgot her name).
This has Begala and Carville written all over it and since they are both CNN emloyees I know they made this happen. Obama's wea performance may have been due to him being nervous to be in an unfriendly crowd.

2) Barack knows he has it in the bag and he's jujst trying to get through the debate without messing up and giving the Feminazis more ammunition. I'm thinking that most Democrats have made up their minds already and this is all a window dressing deal.

3) The Clintons threatened to kill him. Or hire him as their lawyer. Or make him Commerce Secretary.

Obama supporters should be uniformly shocked at what a puppy Obama became at the debate.


 

Hi..I'm back. Tending to my Ron Paul pot plants. They were dyin'.


LOOK at THIS. OMG.  CLICK THAT LINK NOW!

Bloomberg runs=Hillary finished (if she even gets the nomination at all, which I don't think she will)

A Ron Paulite called a radio show and freaked.

You gotta CLICK HEREto hear this to believe it.

The blogs are dismissing him as a nutcase..but i'm sorry to say that any dude who can drop Henry Clay's name in the middle of a temper tantrum about history is, at the very least, interesting and worth hearing.
I actually like the guy's passion. I actually wonder if some of the things he says are right.

Here's the entirety of Missouri Governor Blunt's sudden exit from the race.
Click here.

Doesn't make sense at first glance.
But on second glance makes all the sense in the world.

My take:

Now here's a dude that is so Royal he doesn't have to give a rat's behind about nuthin'. Nuth-in'.
http://hotair.com/archives/2008/01/21/video-bill-clinton-drops-off-to-sleep-during-mlk-commemoration/

McCain's wins have to be seen as a a boost to Giuliani.
There's only one man who can make Rudy look like a spring chicken.


McCain has prettier hands that Hillary, though. I'm sure.


But Hillary has nicer legs than Huckabee. I'm sure.


Ok. Now Mitt looks like a grampa.


And when will someone finally tell Presidential candidates to stay away from West Coast hotel kitchen help. Honestly.

A long time ago I posted on here that I thought Obama had "swing", the kind of "swing" that engages young people and people fed up with government as usual. I figured he had great momentum but also figured he'd get mauled by the Clintonistas and their plantation employees and it would soon be over.

That's not going to happen.

A long time ago I posted that if we were going to be sentenced to having a tax happy big government Democrat in the White House I guess I'd have to wish for Hillary since she seems a better foreign policy tough than Barack.

That's not how I feel anymore.

A long time ago I figured what Republicans would be looking for in a nominee would be a man most matched to Ronald Reagan, a man who appreciated liberal points of view but always swung for the bleachers where Conservatives sat.

Watch me whittle:
Thompson is not going to be elected in a U.S.A general.
McCain is too old and too unstable.
Giuliani is great but lacks the family thing and seems to care little about remaining fresh. But he's my candidate if I had to choose now.
Huckabee is a wild eyed evangelical who has no respect for the Constitution and even contradicts his own website.
Romney is a perfect candidate but is not seen as real by most Americans and he still has to prove he can gain Democrat crossover votes. (I think he probably can if he tries)
Paul is not going to be elected even though I agree with many of his positions and think some of the other positions deserve a hearing.


On the Democratic side Hillary has shown herself to be a terrible candidate. She constantly needs her red faced and boasting blowhard husband to bail her out, and she is a plastic and insincere person who represents the worst of American politics.

She and her liberal supporters are mostly, in my opinion, white guilt ridden limousine liberals who have thus far profited from keeping blacks on the government plantation and who for years have used blacks for political purposes and political purposes only. Welfare addicts, Union siphons, white middle class race hypocrites, and rich white suburban guilt monkeys make up the bulk of the Hillary support.

More recently it has come out that Obama's "pastor" at his Church seems to be some kind of Farrakhan supporter. But actually the pastor, like Obama, and, dare I say, like Farrakhan, happen to believe that blacks should be born conservatives, focusing on individual achievement and on family and on supporting the black community in its financial endeavors. They are demeaned as "black separatists" but in actuality they are supporters of pursuit of individual and collective success without the aid of government. If that's "black Separatism" then I am all for it.

so...fasten your seatbelts: I think Barack Obama can be the next Ronald Reagan--not in philosophy but in impact. Those of you hoping for a Republican President had better fight him like he is the next Ronald Reagan.

President Bush and the gang think they have come up with a grand idea to save the economy from recession by giving us some of the money back they've been stealing the past year.

Trouble is the Democrats, as usual, are using this "stimulus" package to play class warfare.

You see, the Democrats want to "cap" the rebates and only give them to individuals who make $85,000 a year or joint filers who make $115,000. The rest of us can just kiss off and watch our money handed out to citizens who are no less nor no more deserving.

So if you're a family of six making a household of $150,000 you have to sit by while the family of three with a household of $115,000 gets a check for up to $1600 made up partially of your money?

Tell me also why the family of four making a household of $60,000 is more deserving of a rebate than the family of four making a household of $120,000?

What a bunch of B.S. Yet another example of the Democrat vision of America: you're punished for making money and punished for having kids.

There is little question the Bush Administration will bow to the Democrat mafia, for it cares little about whether this wealth redistribution program is equitable in any way.

This Bush plan was no doubt built to suck up to the econo-terrorists in the Democratic Party. The Decider will sell most of us down the river.

What a night of supreme disgrace at Powell Hall.

As a season ticket holder to the St. Louis Speakers series I was appalled at the virtually uncontested bullcrap former Secretary of State Madeline Albright was allowed to lay on the crowd as she shilled for Hillary and tried to gloss over her deadly tenure.

Once a woman of occasionally reasonable ideas and dignity, she has now become a bitter partisan who fraudulently misrepresents the current U.S. policy so as to cover for her own failings.

This woman who sat back and did nothing while we allowed jihadists to kill our citizens on the USS Cole and in the Khobar Towers has a lot of nerve calling for the same old "treat 'em like criminals" approach that ultimately gave terrorists the time and confidence to plan 9/11. Terrorism is not a police matter. That policy killed Americans.

But what does she care after ignoring jihadists and clinking glasses with Kim Jong Il as America's once famous foreign policy socialite?



Terrorism is a global threat that needs global and geopolitical responses. With her bloody hands she has the nerve to say we need to rewind the clock to her old days and chase after a few Mooj while ignoring the causes of terrorism in the first place. How many Americans is she willing to sacrifice for the sake of making the world like us?

Furthermore, Albright went on to repeat her statement that "Bush is the worst President in history", this during a time of war and a war SHE EGGED ON?

No one has done what Saddam Hussein has done, or is thinking of doing. He is producing weapons of mass destruction, and he is qualitatively and quantitatively different from other dictators." 
                                                                      --Madeline Albright. Feb 18, 1998

 
All this while not being brave enough to assess Condi Rice (I took a vow not to criticize a sitting Secretary of State) nor to comment on Barack Obama (I took a vow not to..blah blah blah).

What a shame watching this hag torpedo her credibility.

Troubling too was her constant quipping that she is a supporter of Hillary and setting herself up for a cabinet position in Hillary's White House. She brushed off the possibility of being named to a second term as Secretary of State but did mention--in passing, of course--that "only one other person, Daniel Webster, ever served twice", meaning she clearly has thought about it. It's no accident that she was standing behind Hillary during the grand concession speech in Iowa.

No wonder Democrats are gravitating to Barack Obama. Who wants the ghosts of Billary past lurking around and fiddling while Americans die.

The Hillary prospect is one long and insufferable remake of The Big Chill.

A Big Chill indeed.

Is this a joke?


Bill Clinton having to go to Al Sharpton to kiss his ass and pinky ring?
Is this the same Al Sharpton who basically questioned Obama's black credentials?
See For Yourself

And exactly what is it about "fairytale" that makes Bill Clinton have to kneel to Shaprton's race baiting throne?

Here are Bill's comments. Pathetic? Yes. Racial? No.

So now the Clinton's will see what its like when their leftie hack jobbers funded by George Soros smear people.

I've said all along that the Clintons and their Democratic limousine liberal friends don't give a rip about blacks and consider them only a passive constituency. Most of their policies--like many liberal policies--powered by white liberal guilt.

But it remains a shame they won't even be able to say a word about Obama without being targeted by racial hucksters like Sharpton and Jesse Jackson Jr. Click here for HIS BS.

Obama will show what kind of man he is if he calls off his extortionist dogs. If he sits back and let's his un-appointed backdoor mafia push the race agenda, he's finished.

My bet? The Clintons exposed as insincere is nothing new. But this is the beginning of the end of Obama's alleged "unity" campaign.

What the heck let's all say it with words and pictures.

First off, Fred Thompson owning Huck. Too bad Huck isn't the frontrunner and too bad Fred let his fellow Senator McCain alone. Nonetheless, CLICK HERE for Fred at his best.


Ron Paul is resonating with some folks and raising tons of money, but he needs to listen every once in a while instead of trying to stick to his "America bad" script. CHECK OUT Ron being schooled on Iran.



Meanwhile John Kerry announced today that he's not getting out of the race and he's going to go to the Convention riding Barack's back.
Click Here for the nightmare that is Kerry.



And finally, why not crack on the media. Rudy does it HERE.

Jon Stewart does it HERE.


And finally, finally, Letterman goofs on McCain among others.HERE.